Comments on: We don't know the ocean https://deepseanews.com/2014/11/we-dont-know-the-ocean/ All the news on the Earth's largest environment. Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:39:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: A. Karttunen https://deepseanews.com/2014/11/we-dont-know-the-ocean/#comment-5649 Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:39:58 +0000 https://www.deepseanews.com/?p=53690#comment-5649 This indeed was a great post, coinciding with an almost mystical insight I had about another field of knowledge.

Also Kevin Raskoff’s photo of Marthus Orthocanna
(which you have removed now) crowned it.
Fortunately, I found it again, from here:
http://eu.lumas.com/pictures/kevin_raskoff/hidden_ocean_8_brmarrus_orthocanna/

As what comes to space, and its seas, please see also this:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/cassinifeatures/feature20141110/

]]>
By: RR Helm https://deepseanews.com/2014/11/we-dont-know-the-ocean/#comment-5648 Fri, 07 Nov 2014 01:05:11 +0000 https://www.deepseanews.com/?p=53690#comment-5648 In reply to Eric Rehm.

450 nm wavelength? So the deep sea is tinted slightly green?!?! Is that what this means?

]]>
By: Tharaka Sriram https://deepseanews.com/2014/11/we-dont-know-the-ocean/#comment-5647 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 20:02:46 +0000 https://www.deepseanews.com/?p=53690#comment-5647 Very well written and indeed- what people like to see as the ocean is far more than the beaches to hang out, the fancy coral reef diving etc. It is home to far more creatures that we will ever know and probably never understand.

]]>
By: Alistair Dove https://deepseanews.com/2014/11/we-dont-know-the-ocean/#comment-5646 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:58:54 +0000 https://www.deepseanews.com/?p=53690#comment-5646 In reply to Steve H.

You’re absolutely right. My apologies for not crediting Kevin.

]]>
By: Steve H https://deepseanews.com/2014/11/we-dont-know-the-ocean/#comment-5645 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 02:20:05 +0000 https://www.deepseanews.com/?p=53690#comment-5645 You should credit Kevin Raskoff for his photo.

About the comment on darkness, it is functionally dark down there, even at 1000 meters, other than bioluminescence. You can’t give a flux number and say it is above detectability for some fish if those photons are isotropically emitted and diffusely distributed. Detection is a function of contrast vs background, and that would be the background.

]]>
By: Eric Rehm https://deepseanews.com/2014/11/we-dont-know-the-ocean/#comment-5644 Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:22:57 +0000 https://www.deepseanews.com/?p=53690#comment-5644 “The other 11,450 feet consists of pitch dark and perpetual blackness…” Not so. From Light and Water (Mobley 1994): Cherenkov radiation from relativistic electrons emitted in the decay of naturally occurring potassium-40 ions generates about 1.2×10^6 visible photons/m^2 /s at all depths in very clear waters. Their nighttime measurements to depths of 4300 m in clear waters near Hawaii showed a typical background “glow” of order 10^7 photons/m^2/s, which includes bioluminescence as well as sources such as potassium-40 decay. Thus it is never completely dark at even the greatest depths, even though no solar photons are present. If we assume photons of wavelength 450 nm, then 10^7 photons/m^2 s corresponds to 4×10^-12 W/m^2 which, interestingly, is just *above* the estimated threshold for detectability by some deep-sea fish. “[Emphasis added.]

]]>